top of page

AI and the existential dilemma: Are robots really taking over?



Artificial intelligence (AI) has long been a staple of science fiction, but today, it’s becoming an undeniable reality in our daily lives. From virtual assistants and self-driving cars to advanced healthcare diagnostics, AI is everywhere. But with its rapid rise comes a question that’s both intriguing and alarming: Are robots really taking over?


A recent paper titled "Robots are Taking Over: On AI and Existential Risk" dives deep into this issue, exploring the potential benefits and dangers of AI. The authors—who come from diverse backgrounds including philosophy, engineering, and creative writing—offer a nuanced view of AI, dissecting the fears and hopes that surround this transformative technology.


The double-edged sword of AI

The phrase "The Robots are Taking Over" is one we’ve all heard, often with a mix of humor and dread. But as AI technology advances, what was once a science fiction trope is starting to feel more like a plausible scenario. This paper takes a closer look at why this idea has gained so much traction and what it really means.


AI holds incredible potential. It’s already revolutionizing industries, driving innovation in fields like healthcare, finance, and education. For instance, AI systems can analyze medical data faster and more accurately than human doctors, potentially saving lives by diagnosing diseases earlier. In agriculture, AI helps farmers monitor crops and predict yields, making food production more efficient and sustainable.


But alongside these benefits, AI also brings significant risks. One of the central concerns is the alignment problem: the challenge of ensuring that AI systems act in ways that align with human values. If an AI system pursues goals that are misaligned with what we want, the consequences could be catastrophic. Imagine an AI designed to optimize traffic flow that decides the best way to do so is to eliminate all vehicles from the roads—including emergency services. The problem isn’t that the AI is malevolent; it’s that it’s too good at achieving a goal without understanding the broader context.


The Roots of our fears

So, where do our fears about AI come from? The paper suggests that much of it is rooted in how AI is portrayed in the media and popular culture. Films like "I, Robot" and "The Terminator" have deeply influenced our collective imagination, painting AI as a potential threat to humanity. These stories, while entertaining, often depict a worst-case scenario where AI evolves beyond our control and turns against us.


This fear is further fueled by real-world examples of AI gone awry. Take Amazon’s AI-powered hiring tool, which was found to be biased against women, or facial recognition software that misidentifies people of color at alarming rates. These cases highlight the very real risks of AI, especially when it’s developed and deployed without sufficient oversight or understanding.


However, the paper also emphasizes that not all fears are justified. While it’s true that AI can be dangerous, it’s not inherently so. The key lies in how we design, use, and regulate AI systems. With the right approach, the authors argue, we can harness AI’s potential while minimizing its risks.


Navigating the AI landscape: An HR perspective

From an HR perspective, the rise of AI presents both opportunities and challenges. On the positive side, AI can streamline many HR functions, making processes like recruitment, onboarding, and employee management more efficient. For instance, AI-powered tools can quickly sift through thousands of resumes, identify the best candidates, and even conduct preliminary interviews. This not only saves time but also allows HR professionals to focus on more strategic tasks, such as employee development and engagement.


However, there are also significant concerns. The use of AI in HR processes, particularly in recruitment, has already led to instances of bias and discrimination. As seen in the case of Amazon’s hiring algorithm, AI systems can inadvertently perpetuate existing biases, leading to unfair treatment of certain groups. This underscores the need for HR professionals to be vigilant in how they implement AI tools, ensuring that they are designed and used in ways that promote fairness and inclusivity.


Moreover, the increasing automation of HR tasks raises questions about the future of HR roles themselves. If AI can handle much of the day-to-day work, what does that mean for HR professionals? The paper suggests that while some roles may become obsolete, new opportunities will also emerge. HR professionals may need to upskill, focusing more on areas where human judgment and emotional intelligence are irreplaceable, such as conflict resolution, employee well-being, and organizational culture.


Bridging the gap between fiction and reality

One of the most interesting points the paper makes is about the gap between fiction and reality. While the idea of AI-driven robots taking over the world makes for compelling storytelling, the authors remind us that we’re not there yet—and we might never be. The reality of AI is far more complex and less sensational than what we see in movies.

For example, while AI can outperform humans in specific tasks like playing chess or analyzing large datasets, it’s still far from achieving the kind of general intelligence that would allow it to outthink and outmaneuver us in all areas. Moreover, AI systems are designed with specific goals in mind, and without human intervention, they don’t have the ability to change those goals on their own.


That said, the potential for AI to cause harm—whether through unintended consequences or malicious use—is real. This is why the paper stresses the importance of ongoing research and dialogue around AI. By staying informed and involved, we can help shape the development of AI in ways that maximize its benefits and minimize its risks.


Conclusion: Embracing AI with caution

As AI continues to evolve, it’s clear that we’re only at the beginning of understanding its full impact. The paper "Robots are Taking Over: On AI and Existential Risk" offers a balanced perspective on this complex issue, urging us to approach AI with both optimism and caution.

Yes, AI has the potential to revolutionize our world for the better. But it also has the potential to cause significant harm if not managed properly. The challenge lies in finding the right balance—embracing the technology’s possibilities while remaining vigilant about its risks.


From an HR standpoint, this means not only leveraging AI to improve efficiency and decision-making but also ensuring that these tools are used ethically and inclusively. HR professionals have a critical role to play in guiding their organizations through the AI transition, helping to create workplaces where technology enhances, rather than diminishes, human potential.


In the end, the authors of the paper call for a collective effort to shape the future of AI. Through education, transparency, and regulation, we can ensure that AI serves humanity rather than undermines it. It’s a future where robots and AI don’t "take over," but instead, work alongside us to create a better world.

 



 

About Stephan Ledain


Stephan is a practicing organizational scientist and a people consultant. His research specializes in creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Identification in the workplace. In his work, he leverages the latest in behavioral and data science as well as technology to create tools that drive workplace performance.


He has worked with world-leading consultancies, FTSE 100 firms, and start-ups to introduce rigor to their talent management and assessment strategies. He has experience coaching C-suite stakeholders through the power of evidence-based practice for effective people decisions.

Comments


bottom of page